Mass, C, N, and lignin from litter decomposed across a shrub gradient and with snow manipulations near Toolik Field Station between 2003 and 2009.

Abstract: 

In arctic tundra near Toolik Lake, Alaska, we incubated a common substrate in a snow addition experiment to test whether snow accumulation around arctic deciduous shrubs altered the environment enough to increase litter decomposition rates. We compared the influence of litter quality on the rate of litter and N loss by decomposing litter from four different plant functional types in a common site. We used aboveground net primary production values and estimated k values from our decomposition experiments to calculate community-weighted mass loss for each site.

Project Keywords: 

Data set ID: 

10499

EML revision ID: 

6

Short name: 

2006-2007_JD_SnowShrub_Litter_Decomp

DOI: 

10.6073/pasta/03203454
People

Keywords: 

Arctic LTER keywords: 

Taxa: 

Dates

Date Range: 

Sunday, June 1, 2003 to Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Publication Date: 

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Methods: 

Site Selection:
In the fall of 2005, three sites were selected that varied primarily in deciduous shrub abundance, hereafter referred to as low, medium and high shrub sites. Sites were chosen to have similar state factors (climate, relief, parent material, and time) but varied in the abundance of deciduous shrubs (Jenny, 1994). The sites represent a natural gradient of increasing shrub abundance because the same species of deciduous shrubs (Betula nana, and Salix pulchra) are found at all three sites (except S. richardsonii, which is found only at the medium shrub site); however, their percent cover increases from 15 to 94 %. Our sites are within 1 km of each other, and have similar parent material, and time since last glaciation (Itkillik I, deglaciated ca. 60 000 yr), and regional climate, although microclimates vary across sites due to differences in slope and aspect. The low shrub site is located on top of gently rolling hills, while the medium and high shrub sites are located in depressions along water tracks of ephemeral streams fed by spring snowmelt.
Our low shrub abundance site is located in moist acidic tussock tundra where the vegetation consists of approximately equal biomass of graminoids (Eriophorum vaginatum and Carex bigelowii), dwarf deciduous shrubs (B. nana, Vaccinium uliginosum, and S. pulchra), evergreen shrubs (Ledum palustre ssp. decumbens and V. vitis-idea), and mosses (Hylocomium splendens, Aulacomnium turgidum, Dicranum spp., and Sphagnum spp.) (Shaver and Chapin, 1991). In our medium shrub abundance site, vegetation consists of graminoids (primarily C. bigelowii), deciduous shrubs (B. nana, V. uliginosum, S. pulchra and S. richardsonii), and mosses (H. splendens and Dicranum spp.). Our high shrub abundance site has predominantly deciduous shrubs (B. nana, S. pulchra, and some Potentilla fruticosa) with some evergreen or wintergreen shrubs (V. vitis-idaea and Linnaea borealis), forbs (Polygonum bistorta, Petasites frigidus, Stellaria longipes, Valeriana capitata, and Artemisia alaskana), graminoids (Poa arctica, C. bigelowii, and Calamagrostis canadensis), and mosses (Sphagnum spp. and H. splendens).

Snow Manipulation:
To manipulate snow depth, snow fences (1.5 m high and 62 m long) were set up in the fall of 2005 at the low and medium sites to manipulate snow depth. For the high site, the patchy nature of the shrub stands made it necessary to set up two separate snow fences (1.5 m high and 32 m long) in patches with similar shrub composition and density. Our purpose for adding snow was to simulate the amount of snow that might be trapped by deciduous shrubs; therefore, the height of the snow fences was selected to match the maximum shrub height within the region. Fences were oriented E-W, and snow drifts accumulated on the northern side of the fences. Two treatments (control=ambient snow and drift=manipulated snow) were set up at each site. The drift plots were set up 4 m from the fence on the northern side of the fence, because this was the zone of maximum snow accumulation. At the low and medium sites, the control plots were set up on the southern (non-drift) side of the fence, 10 m from the fence at the low site, and 7 m from the fence at the medium site. These buffer zones were left to prevent the control from being exposed to snow trapped by the fence. At the high shrub sites, control plots were located in line with one of the fences, beginning 5 m from its end, and in 3 discontinuous blocks of tall shrubs to the south (control side) of the fence, beginning approximately 15 m from the fence. This arrangement was chosen because the cover of tall shrubs was discontinuous on the southern (control) side of the fences. For all sites, plots on the drift side of the fences were located in the zone of maximum snow accumulation, which was relatively uniform. Within each treatment, 18 2 by 10 m plots, with 1 m buffer strips between, were established. For this study, six plots per treatment (n=6) were randomly assigned to measure N mineralization and nitrification. Remaining plots were used for additional experiments.

Snow addition effects on litter decomposition (common substrate experiment):
To directly test the effect of microclimate and snow addition on litter decomposition rates we incubated the senesced leaves from a common substrate, B. neoalaskana (Sarg.), in the ambient and snow manipulated plots across all three sites. Senesced leaves were collected from trees growing near Fairbanks, AK. Leaves were still attached to the trees but the petiole had already started to abscise. This common substrate was used because the large leaf size and relative abundance allowed us to collect enough material for our study. Leaves were air dried, well mixed, and then subsampled for litter bags. One gram of leaves was sewn into 2 mm mesh bags, 8 x 8-cm in size. Litter bags were incubated beneath the live moss and litter layer starting in early June of 2006. The moss and litter in this system are well mixed so bags were inserted in this layer. Four identical bags were strung together for four separate annual harvests. Bags were placed in six treatment plots in each site (n=6), with three sub-replicates within each plot. Bags were removed in July of 2007, 2008, and 2009 and were kept frozen until they could be processed.
At time of processing, bags were thawed and then gently rinsed with deionized (DI) water to remove soil and loose litter attached to the outside of the bag. All original leaf litter was removed, dried at 45° C for a minimum of 48 hours and weighed. To determine the percent C and N of the litter, samples were ground to a fine powder on a Wiley-mill, with a #40 mesh screen, and then analyzed using an ECS 4010 elemental analyzer (Costech Analytical, Valencia, California, USA). Percent of initial mass remaining was calculated by dividing the incubated mass by the initial mass and multiplying by 100. Percent of initial C (ICR) and initial N remaining (INR) was calculated by the following equation:

Sites sampled.

Download a comma delimited (csv) or Excel file (includes metadata and data sheets).

Use of the data requires acceptance of the data use policy --> Arctic LTER Data Use Policy

To cite this data set see the citation example on the LTER Network Data Portal page for this data set.

Variables Details

(Variables names are in the first line/row of the CSV file and Excel data sheet.)
Experiment
  • Label: Experiment
  • Definition: Type of experiment: a common substrate or a common garden: CS=common substrate; CG=common garden
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Treatment
  • Label: Treatment
  • Definition: there are two treatments of snow levels for the Common substrate experiment: C=ambient snow cover; S=snow addition The Common garden experiment was fertilized where: C=no treatment; F=fertilized with nitrogen
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Litter tissue type
  • Label: Litter tissue type
  • Definition: there are two litter tissue types (leaves and stems)
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Site of litter collection
  • Label: Site of litter collection
  • Definition: this is the site were the litter was originally collected
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Species
  • Label: Species
  • Definition: name of the plant species
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Plant growth from
  • Label: Plant growth from
  • Definition: functional type of plant where DE=deciduous shrub; EV=evergreen shrub; GR=graminoid; MO=moss
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Site of incubation
  • Label: Site of incubation
  • Definition: site and vegetation type of where litter was incubated in the field: Low=low shrub site (moist acidic tundra); Med=medium shrub site (low deciduous shrub tundra); High=high shrub site (tall deciduous shrub tundra)
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Plot
  • Label: Plot
  • Definition: within each site and each treatment there are six 10 x 10 m plots
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Year collected
  • Label: Year collected
  • Definition: year litter bags were removed from the field: Note: Common substrate bags installed in June 2006 and removed in June 2007, 2008, 2009; Common garden litter bags installed July 2003 and removed 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2008
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
Days in the field
  • Label: Days in the field
  • Definition: number of days that litter bags was incubating in the field
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: number
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
IMR
  • Label: IMR
  • Definition: percent of initial mass remaining as calculated as IMR=(t1 mass)/(t0 mass) × 100
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
C
  • Label: C
  • Definition: percent of C in the litter as measured on a elemental analyzer
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
N
  • Label: N
  • Definition: percent of N in the litter as measured on a elemental analyzer
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
ICR
  • Label: ICR
  • Definition: percent of initial C remaining in the litter calculated as ICR=((t1 mass) × t1 C) ))/((t0 mass) × t0 C)))× 100
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
INR
  • Label: INR
  • Definition: percent of initial N remaining in the litter calculated as INR=((t1 mass) × t1 N) ))/((t0 mass) × t0 N)))× 100
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
NPE
  • Label: NPE
  • Definition: non-polar extracts (carbohydrates, lipids, pectin, starch, and soluble proteins)
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
WS
  • Label: WS
  • Definition: hemicullulose and bound proteins
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
AS
  • Label: AS
  • Definition: cellulose
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured
Lignin
  • Label: Lignin
  • Definition: lignin
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values:
    • NA = not measured