Percent carbon and nitrogen of leaves from shoots harvested at three levels in the canopy from 19 plots dominated by S. pulchra and B. nana shrubs near LTER Shrub plots at Toolik Field Station, AK the summer of 2012.

Abstract: 

The percent carbon and nitrogen from leaves of shoots harvested from 1m x 1m point frame plots the summer of 2012 at Toolik Lake, Alaska. were measured on a ThermoScientific 2000. For each point frame plot, six shoots were harvested from upper, middle, and low sections of the canopy. The photosynthetic capacity of each shoot was analyzed with a LiCor 6400 infra-red gas analyzer by being run through a light response and A/Ci curve. The area of the shoot as viewed from the stop of the LiCor opaque, confer chamber ("silhouette area") as well as the area of each shoot organ type was measured. These data are published separately, though methods are described below.

Project Keywords: 

Data set ID: 

10147

EML revision ID: 

7

Short name: 

2012_GS_ITEX_PF_CHN_Data
People

Keywords: 

Arctic LTER keywords: 

Taxa: 

Dates

Date Range: 

Saturday, June 23, 2012 to Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Publication Date: 

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Methods: 

HARVEST METHOD:
The methods for setting up each point frame plot are described in both the "PinDropData" and "PF_LAI" datasets. The methods here describe how each shoot was harvested from the plots which were used for the point frame method.

Six shoots were harvested from each of 19 1m x 1m point frame plots which were dominated either by Salix pulchra or Betula nana tall, shrub species. The "shoots" described here are branch clippings between eight to ten inches long. Whenever possible they were selected for appearing relatively healthy, intact leaves, and each shoot was taken from a different plant. As these shoots were used for shoot-level and leaf-level measurements, shoots with bi-furcated stems -- or two stems from the same branch/height were cut -- one for leaf-level and the second for shoot-level analyses.

Before being cut, we measured the distance from the point frame to the highest tip on the shoot as well as the distance from the point frame to the shoot five inches from the tip. This way, we could approximate the angle of the shoot relative to the ground. Using the same criteria as for the pin-drop measurements, we measured the distance from the top of the shoot to the soil. In addition, the row number and pin-hole number nearest to the shoot's location with respect to the point frame was also recorded .

We then measured the leaf area index (LAI) of the shoot by holding an LAI-2000 (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) in the exact location where the shoot had been and taking the average of three readings (one above, three below). For these measurements we used the one-quarter cut out and took care to always hold the instrument level and with the technician's body casting a uniform shadow over the instrument's eye, with the technician standing between the instrument and the sun. On occasion when it was raining during the shoot harvest, the area near where the shoot had been was marked with flagging tape, and the the LAI measurement was taken at a later date, using the height from frame/distance from ground meausrements as well as the row number and pin hole measurements as a guide.

Once cut, the shoot was placed immediately into water and transported to the lab. Once in the lab, the end of each shoot was clipped under water to ensure that there were no air bubbles in the stem that would inhibit the flow of water. Shoots were then allowed to sit at ambient room conditions (~20-25 degrees Celsius) until the the photosynthetic rates could be measured.

AREA CALCULATIONS:
Area calculations were made using the open source software Image J, available at http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/download.html. The procedures for each kind of area calculation are outlined here:

SHOOT SILHOUETTE AREA: Digital image capture of intact stem and leaves
1. Arrange the shoot on a white background (e.g. blank paper or foam board) as it sat in the LiCor conifer chamber. Add a note of sample number and date.
2. Place a ruler that you can later use as a reference. Ensure ruler/stem do not overlap.
3. Use a tripod to hold the camera in a steady position and as close as possible to the stem, keep this distance constant throughout the samples if possible to avoid the need to re-calibrate Image J.
4. Take a digital image of the shoot in very bright light conditions, using diffuser or reflector panels as needed to minimize shadows. [Shadows can be mistakenly analyzed in the software as plant tissue if not careful.]
5. Download the images in the computer, save them as TIFF files.
 
SHOOT TISSUE AREA: Image capture of shoot tissues (leaf, petiole, stipule, organ, green/brown stem) using a scanner
 1. Pluck the sample with forceps, arrange leaves, petioles, stipules, green and brown stems and inflorescences separately, grouped by type onto the white background of a plastic board. Place a ruler that you can later use as a reference. Add a note of sample number and date.
2. Press flat with the clear plastic cover. Ensure ruler/plant parts are not overlapping.
3. Place plastic side down on scanner (ensure no parts have overlapped when inverting plastic board).
4. Scan the images to the computer, save them as TIFF files.
 
BOTH SILHOUETTE AND TISSUE AREA ANALYSES:
In the Image J software program:  
1. Open leaf image via Select File → Open→ your file name
2. Convert scanned colour image of leaf to greyscale:
3. Image→Type→8 bit
4. Set measurement scale: Draw a line over a 50 mm section of the ruler then Analyze →Set Scale
 5. In Set Scale window enter 50 into the 'Known Distance' box and change the 'Unit of Measurement' box to mm , check 'Global' (the Global option will apply the same scale to all the images you open after this, if you took the photos from different heights you might need to repeat this procedure every time)
6. Draw a new line and confirm that the measurement scale is correct.
7. Threshold the leaf image: Image→ adjust→ threshold
8. Play with sliders to include all of leaf in red and click ‘Apply’
 9. Calculate area of entire silhouette area and area of each tissue type:
Enclose the region of the shoot or tissues that you wish to calculate the area for with the rectangular selection tool, then Analyze → Analyze Particles
 10. Select the options of display masks and display results.
Area of measured pixels is displayed. Check that only your leaf is included in the outline (not the ruler or extraneous tissue types).
The data of the leaf area is displayed on a new window ‘summary’, this data can be copied into Excel or the data can be saved directly as an Excel file. Keep summary window open between picture analyses to maintain a record of measured areas.
 11. Save new black and white image as well as its original colour photo with an appropriate file name.

DRYING AND WEIGHING:
Once digital images of each shoot and tissue had been made, each plant tissue was separated, counted, and placed in a labeled coin envelope. These samples were then dried for a minimum of three days at 60 degrees Celsius prior to being weighed on a four-point balance with glass enclosure.

Plant tissues were weighed in aggregate, thus the average mass included in these data are the total tissue mass divided by the count of that tissue (e.g. number of leaves, petioles, etc). In the same manner, plant tissure area was calculated in aggregate, thus the average area per leaf/petiole/stipule is based on the total area of that tissue divided by the count of that tissue.

At the start of this project, we did not take care to distinguish leaves, petioles, or stipules. While not thought to make a significant difference in the area or mass calculations for most samples, we did not want to include the petioles in the CHN analyses. Thus, for those samples that had removeable petioles (all B. nana, most S. pulchra, but no Vaccinium spp. or L. palustre samples), the petioles were clipped after drying and the leaves re-weighed. In some cases the mass of the leaves with petioles removed was greater than the original mass; in these cases, the original mass was preserved. [The original mass of all samples weighed is listed in the ORIGINAL LEAF MASS W/ PETIOLE data-column.]

NOTE: The area used for correcting the LiCor A/Ci and light curve data included leaves, petioles, and stipules.

CHN ANALYSIS:
Grinding: All leaf samples were dried in an oven at 60°C before grinding. Samples were small enough to grind the entire sample without subsampling. Leaves were ground using the Retsch MM 200 for 3 minutes or until a talcum powder consistency was achieved.

Weighing: After grinding, samples were stored in glass scintillation vials and dried again at 60°C for at least 36 hours. Once samples were removed, vials were tightly re-capped. When not in use, vials were stored in dessicators. 3.5-4.5 mg of each sample was weighed into a 10x12 mm tin capsule. A standard calibration curve was created using increasing amounts of aspartic acid (from about 0.2 mg to 5.0 mg). A chemical standard, acetanilide, and an organic sample, apple leaf, were run after the standard curve. Every ten samples, an aspartic acid check standard and a duplicate of an already-packed sample were run.

CN analysis: CN analysis was run between 10/4/2012 and 11/15/2012 by Rachel Rubin using the ThermoScientific 2000 at the Ecosystems Center, MBL, Woods Hole, MA. Duplicate sample values were averaged (mass, %N and %C) before inclusion into final results. The CHN data is available in the file "PF_CHN".
ITEX Manual, updated 2011

ITEX Manual, updated 2011

Sites sampled.

Download a comma delimited (csv) or Excel file (includes metadata and data sheets).

Use of the data requires acceptance of the data use policy --> Arctic LTER Data Use Policy

To cite this data set see the citation example on the LTER Network Data Portal page for this data set.

Variables Details

(Variables names are in the first line/row of the CSV file and Excel data sheet.)
YEAR
  • Label: YEAR
  • Definition: year of measurement
  • Type: Date/time
  • Date format: YYYY
  • Missing values: None specified
Date
  • Label: Date
  • Definition: Date of Measurement
  • Type: Date/time
  • Date format: dd-mmm-yy
  • Missing values: None specified
SITE
  • Label: SITE
  • Definition: Toolik
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
GROUP
  • Label: GROUP
  • Definition: Measurement location in relation to Toolik Lake LTER Shrub plots; In vicinity of Block1 = Upland, IVO Block 2 = Outlet
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
PLOT
  • Label: PLOT
  • Definition: Individual plot identifier
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
TREATMENT
  • Label: TREATMENT
  • Definition: control or fertilized annually (with N and P)
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
PLOT SIZE
  • Label: PLOT SIZE
  • Definition: 1m x 1m point frame size
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
DOM VEG
  • Label: DOM VEG
  • Definition: Dominant canopy vegetation
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
SPP
  • Label: SPP
  • Definition: Shoot species sampled
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
SHOOT ID
  • Label: SHOOT ID
  • Definition: Identification for each shoot sampled (NOT unique); consists of canopy position (up/mid/low), species abbreviation, and a number
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
CANOPY POSN
  • Label: CANOPY POSN
  • Definition: Relative position of shoot in the canopy
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
RUN
  • Label: RUN
  • Definition: Number of the tray run through the CHN analysis (ThermoScientific2000)
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
SAMPLE NAME
  • Label: SAMPLE NAME
  • Definition: Unique sample ID created by combining the PLOT with the SHOOT ID
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified
SAMPLE CODE
  • Label: SAMPLE CODE
  • Definition: Sample location on the tray run through the CHN analysis (ThermoScientific 2000)
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: number
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values: None specified
MASS (MG)
  • Label: MASS (MG)
  • Definition: Mass of the ground sample used for the run (mg leaf)
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: milligram
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values: None specified
%N
  • Label: %N
  • Definition: percent Nitrogen in sample (%)
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values: None specified
%C
  • Label: %C
  • Definition: percent Carbon in sample (%)
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: percent
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values: None specified
C:N
  • Label: C:N
  • Definition: Ratio of carbon to nitrogen (%C / %N)
  • Type: Physical quantity
  • Unit: dimensionless
  • Maximum: Not specified
  • Minimum: Not specified
  • Precision: Not specified
  • Missing values: None specified
COMMENTS
  • Label: COMMENTS
  • Definition: Notes about samples
  • Type: Nominal
  • Missing values: None specified