|Title||Differences in carbon and nutrient fractions among arctic growth forms|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||1988|
|Authors||F Stuart Chapin III, Shaver, GR|
|Keywords||Alaska carbon, USA|
In a survey of 28 plant species of 6 major growth forms from Alaskan tundra, the authors found no consistent difference among growth forms in the chemical nature of stored reserves except for lichens and mosses (which stored C primarily as polysaccharides) and shrubs (which tended to store C more as sugars than as polysaccharides). From this survey, the authors draw three general conclusions: (1) the photosynthetic function of leaves strongly constrains leaf chemistry so that similar chemical composition is found in all species and growth forms; (2) the chemical nature of storage reserves is highly variable, both within and among growth forms; (3) the concentration and seasonal pattern of storage reserves are closely linked to growth-form and reflect growth-form differences in woodiness, phenology, and relative dependence upon concurrent uptake vs. storage in support of growth.
|Short Title||Differences in carbon and nutrient fractions among arctic growth forms|